The Hallmarks of Aging
Twelve biological processes that researchers have converged on as the shared machinery of aging. They are the reference framework for the entire field, and they are the single most misused idea in longevity marketing.
This page does two things. It states each hallmark plainly, so the vocabulary is yours rather than a brochure's. And beside each one it states where the human randomized evidence actually stands, which in most cases is further back than the marketing implies.
Last reviewed: July 2026
A hallmark explains why someone tried an intervention. The grade reflects what happened when they did.
Nothing on this page feeds an EBL grade. Not one letter on this site was assigned because an ingredient acts on a hallmark, and no grade will ever be raised on mechanistic grounds. Grades come from published human randomized trials, at the dose and form actually studied, with the PMID PubMed ID: the permanent number the US National Library of Medicine gives a published paper. Each one links to that paper's record on PubMed. attached.
We publish this framework because it is real biology and because you deserve to understand the language being used to sell to you. “Supports mitochondrial function” is a statement about a hallmark. It is not a statement about a trial, and the two are constantly presented as though they were the same thing.
Nine were named in 2013.
Three more were added in 2023.
The original framework listed nine. The 2023 revision added disabled macroautophagy, chronic inflammation, and dysbiosis, bringing the set to twelve. That the list itself changed within a decade is worth holding onto: this is an organising framework under active revision, not a settled map.
Genomic instability
DNA takes damage continuously, from normal metabolism, radiation, and chemical exposure. Repair machinery clears most of it. Across a lifetime, the errors that escape repair accumulate in the genome.
No intervention has been shown in a human randomized trial to reduce genomic damage and thereby extend life or reduce disease. Damage markers can be measured; moving them has not been linked to a hard outcome.
Telomere attrition
Chromosome ends carry protective caps that shorten with each cell division. When they run down far enough, the cell stops dividing.
Telomere length is measurable but is a noisy individual-level marker, and no randomized human trial has shown that lengthening telomeres improves survival or disease outcomes. EBL reads it as context, never as a result on its own.
Epigenetic alterations
Chemical marks on DNA and its packaging proteins decide which genes are switched on in which tissue. That pattern drifts with age, so cells read the wrong instructions for what they are.
Epigenetic clocks A test that estimates biological age from chemical marks on DNA (DNA methylation). are the basis of most consumer biological-age tests. They are trained to predict age and mortality in populations; they have not been validated as endpoints The outcome a trial measures to decide whether the treatment worked, such as heart attacks, blood pressure or a symptom score. that, when moved, deliver a proven clinical benefit to an individual.
Loss of proteostasis
Cells maintain a workforce of chaperones and disposal systems that keep proteins correctly folded and clear the ones that fail. That quality control degrades with age, and misfolded proteins accumulate.
Central to Alzheimer's and Parkinson's biology, where it is studied intensively. As a general longevity target in healthy adults there is no randomized human evidence that improving proteostasis changes outcomes.
Disabled macroautophagy
The cell's bulk recycling program packages up damaged organelles and protein aggregates and digests them. Its capacity falls with age, so debris that should be cleared stays put.
This is the mechanism most often invoked to sell fasting protocols. Autophagy The process cells use to break down and recycle their own worn-out parts. has not been measured directly in the fasting trials that are cited for it. Those trials measured weight, glucose, and lipids. EBL grades the diets on what was actually measured, which is why caloric restriction, 5:2 intermittent fasting, the ketogenic diet, and the fasting-mimicking diet all sit at C.
Deregulated nutrient sensing
Insulin and IGF-1 signalling, mTOR A signaling pathway that controls cell growth. Turning it down is one proposed mechanism behind several longevity interventions., AMPK, and the sirtuins together tell the cell whether nutrients are plentiful or scarce, and set growth against repair accordingly. With age this network stops tracking the real nutrient state.
The most heavily targeted hallmark in the supplement market, and the source of most mechanistic marketing language. Human trials here overwhelmingly report surrogate endpoints A lab value or measurement used in place of the outcome that matters, such as LDL cholesterol standing in for heart attacks. Moving a surrogate does not always move the outcome. (glucose, insulin, lipids) not survival or disease incidence.
Mitochondrial dysfunction
Mitochondria generate cellular energy. With age their respiratory efficiency falls, they leak more reactive oxygen species, and the quality-control systems that recycle the damaged ones work less well.
A large fraction of the supplement market is sold on this hallmark. Where human RCTs exist they typically measure exercise capacity, fatigue, or a lab marker over weeks to months. That is what earns a grade on this site, not the mitochondrial rationale.
Cellular senescence
Damaged cells can arrest permanently instead of dividing or dying. They persist, and secrete an inflammatory mixture that degrades the tissue around them.
Senolytics A compound intended to clear senescent cells: older cells that have stopped dividing but remain in tissue. are the most-hyped intervention class in longevity. Human trials so far are small, short, and focused on specific conditions. There is no completed randomized trial showing that clearing senescent cells extends life or prevents age-related disease in people.
Stem-cell exhaustion
Each tissue keeps a reserve of stem cells for repair and replacement. That reserve is depleted and its regenerative capacity declines with age.
Widely used to market clinic-administered stem-cell and exosome procedures. For general age-related decline, the randomized human evidence supporting those procedures does not exist.
Altered intercellular communication
Cells and tissues coordinate through hormonal, neural, and immune signalling. With age those signals become noisier and more inflammatory, so tissues stop cooperating well.
Hormone replacement is the most-studied intervention touching this hallmark, and it has substantial randomized evidence. For defined clinical indications, not as a general anti-aging strategy. The distinction matters.
Chronic inflammation
A persistent, low-grade inflammatory tone develops with age in the absence of any infection. Often called inflammaging. It both drives and is driven by several of the other hallmarks.
This hallmark has the strongest human outcome data of the twelve. Inflammatory markers such as hs-CRP High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, a blood marker of low-grade inflammation. predict cardiovascular events, and randomized anti-inflammatory drug trials have moved hard endpoints An outcome that matters directly to a person and is counted without judgment, such as death, heart attack, stroke or fracture.. That evidence belongs to specific drugs at specific doses. It does not transfer to supplements marketed as anti-inflammatory.
Dysbiosis
The gut microbial community shifts with age, losing diversity and changing the metabolites it produces, which affects the gut barrier, immune signalling, and metabolism.
Almost all of the compelling data is observational Research that watches what people already do rather than assigning a treatment. It can show that two things travel together, not that one causes the other. or from animal models. The randomized human probiotic trials that exist are strain-specific and short, and their results do not generalize across products or species.
The hallmarks are the most useful teaching framework in the field. They are also the most efficient way ever devised to make an unevidenced product sound rigorous.
The move is always the same. Name a hallmark. Show that a compound touches it in a cell culture or a mouse. Let the reader complete the sentence themselves, that it therefore slows their aging. No human trial is ever claimed, so nothing false is technically said.
Reading down the twelve above, the pattern is hard to miss. For most of them, the honest answer to “what happens in people when you target this?” is that we do not yet know. That gap is not a failure of the framework. It is the current state of the science, and it is the reason this site grades trials rather than pathways.
The hallmarks describe the biology, and knowing them makes the sales language easier to recognize. A grade describes what happened when an intervention was actually tested in people. Neither answers what happened in one person. That is what a baseline and a retest measure.
López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186(2):243–278. PMID 36599349
Superseding the original nine-hallmark framework: López-Otín C, et al. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194–1217. PMID 23746838
Educational use only · Not medical advice. Descriptions of aging biology are not claims that any product alters it. See EBL's Position.