Skip to main content
Evidence Based Longevity (EBL)Check what I take
Methodology

Registry Trace

Every letter on this site rests on published papers, and every paper is listed with its PubMed identifier so anyone can open it. This page asks a harder question about the same citations: how much of that evidence is independently traceable, without taking anyone's word for what the study was.

Two facts answer it, and neither of them is ours. The first is the study design that the National Library of Medicine's own indexers assigned to a paper, which is not what the authors called it and not what we filed it as. The second is whether the citation carries a public trial registration, meaning the study was declared before its results were known.

Both facts are published. Neither is usually shown. We are showing ours because the numbers are not flattering and a reader is entitled to them.

Last reviewed: August 2026

Why registration is the fact that matters

A study declared before it runs can be checked against what it later reports. A study first seen at publication cannot.

Since 2005, the major medical journals have required a trial to be publicly registered before enrolment as a condition of publication. Registration records what the trial intended to measure, in whom, and for how long. It is the only mechanism that makes two otherwise invisible things visible: a trial that quietly changed which outcome it called primary once the data arrived, and a trial that finished and was never published at all.

Neither of those is rare. The reason our homocysteine An amino acid in the blood that rises when vitamin B12, folate or B6 are low. entry says what it says is that somebody assembled nineteen unpublished datasets and found the answer differed from the entire published literature on the same genotype. That is not an anomaly in the evidence base. It is a property of it.

The corpus

What sits under our letters.

Counted from our own database at build time, so these figures cannot drift from the citations they describe. The second row of the table below is the one worth reading slowly: an entity where nothing is indexed as a trial and nothing is registered is an entity whose evidence you have to take on the paper's own description of itself.

217 of 530
Registration-traceable randomized trials
Citations PubMed indexes as randomized trials, published 2006 or later, that carry a registration you can look up.
238 of 1228
Graded citations carrying a registration
Across every letter on the site, at every publication year.
143
Citations with no indexed study design
PubMed assigned them no design type at all. That is a fact about the indexing before it is a fact about the study.
1228
Graded citations traced
Every PubMed identifier sitting under a letter grade on this site.
EntityGradeCitationsIndexed as trialRegistered
Ashwagandha standardized root extract 300 mg twice dailyB310
Hyaluronic Acid (Oral)B951
Mediterranean diet + extra-virgin olive oilA531
Stool-based colorectal screening (gFOBT and FIT)A532
Structured exercise program after treatment for non-metastatic cancerB321
REHIT / Sprint Interval TrainingB751
Fasting-mimicking diet (FMD, 5-day cycles)B753
Blood Flow Restriction TrainingB860
Psyllium husk (10 to 15 g/day) for LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the cholesterol fraction most closely tied to plaque in the arteries.B431
Ashwagandha (standardized root extract)B1080
Photobiomodulation (musculoskeletal)B540
NattokinaseB541
Concurrent training sequence: resistance before aerobic (same session)B650
Adequate dietary protein (1.2 to 1.6 g/kg/day)B651
Pneumatic Compression (sequential)A760
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for DepressionA15134
EGCG (Epigallocatechin Gallate / Green Tea Extract)B871
Creatine MonohydrateA13123
Photobiomodulation to Prevent Oral MucositisA14132
Vitamin D3B17164
Alcohol reductionB770
Amla (Indian Gooseberry, Emblica officinalis)B220
Beta-AlanineB220
Boswellia serrataB220
Cinnamon (Cassia / Ceylon)B220
Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10)B550
Collagen PeptidesB880
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT)B550
Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum)B440
Ginkgo Biloba (EGb 761)B770
HRV BiofeedbackB440
Home blood pressure monitoringB220
Inositol (Myo-inositol)B220
MelatoninB13130
Mobility and fall-prevention protocolsB220
Oat beta-glucan (3 g/day or more) for LDL-CB550
Plant sterols or stanols 1.6 to 2 g/dayB110
Pneumatic Lymphatic CompressionB110
RIMSO-50 (Dimethyl Sulfoxide Bladder Instillation)B550
Resistance training 2–3×/weekA880
Saffron (Crocus sativus)B220
Sleep restriction treatment (CBT-I)B220
Sodium reduction to under 2,300 mg/dayB440
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve StimulationA990
Bright Light Therapy for DepressionB14141
VO₂max The most oxygen the body can use during all-out exercise, a standard measure of aerobic fitness. training (Zone 2 + intervals)A771
DASH dietary patternB661
Whole-food plant-based dietB10102
Berberine HClB992
Aerobic exercise (Zone 2) 150 min/weekA441
Custom Foot OrthoticsB441
Ketogenic diet (very-low-carbohydrate)B882
MBSR (Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction) 8-week programB441
ZincB441
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) after Knee ReplacementA11113
Berberine 1.0 to 1.2 g/day (with meals)B772
Inspiratory Muscle TrainingB10103
Aged garlic extract (480 mg/day for blood pressure; 2.4 g/day in plaque trials)B331
Omega-3. High-dose EPA (icosapent ethyl, 4 g)B331
Zone 2 aerobic trainingA331
Mindfulness meditation for sleep (weekly group course with daily home practice)B883
Avoiding ultra-processed foodB774
SGLT2 inhibitors (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin)A333
SemaglutideA333
What these numbers are not

An unindexed trial is still a trial.

This page could be misread badly, so here is the limit of it stated first. A missing design type means the National Library of Medicine's indexers did not assign one. It does not mean the study was not a trial. Indexing is done by people, at scale, sometimes years after publication, and it is patchy.

The case that proves it

One of our own citations is titled Pterostilbene on metabolic parameters: a randomized, double-blind Neither the participants nor the people assessing them know who received the real treatment until the trial ends., and placebo-controlled trial. PubMed assigns it no study design whatsoever. It also carries a public registration, which anyone can look up. So the paper says randomized, the registry backs it, and the index is silent. Three sources, one of them missing, and the missing one is not the study.

For that reason nothing on this page is treated as evidence against a study, and no letter grade on this site has ever been set or changed by it. The build check that produces these figures will only speak about an A or a B when every single citation on the record lacks both an indexed design and a registration, which is a much narrower claim than any one number here.

The same caution runs the other way. A registration proves a study was declared. It does not prove the study was good, that it was large, that it measured something that matters, or that what was published matches what was declared. Checking that last one requires reading the registration against the paper, which is a separate piece of work and is not what this page does.

How this is produced

Generated, not asserted.

The design types and registration accessions are harvested from PubMed by a script, committed as data, and rendered from that data at build time. The page is reproducible from the repository alone. A separate build check refuses the deploy if a graded citation is missing from the trace, if the trace carries an identifier no grade cites any more, or if an A or B grade has no independently recognisable trial anywhere beneath it.

Where that last check has found something, the record is named in the build log and left for editorial review rather than quietly excused. That register only shrinks.