Supplement · graded by use, 11 uses
Vitamin C
Common-cold duration with daily supplementation.
At a glance
Vitamin C taken every day, before a cold starts, made colds a little shorter and milder in many studies, by about half a day in adults. It did not stop people from catching colds. Starting it after a cold began did not help. In large studies it did not prevent heart disease or cancer. Very high doses given by drip in hospital did harm in very sick patients.
The B belongs to one of the 11 uses graded on this record. The other 10 carry their own letters.
As studied, and the trials
Hemilä and Chalker (Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013; PMID 23440782) pooled 31 placebo-controlled comparisons with 9,745 cold episodes: taking vitamin C every day shortened colds by 8 percent in adults (95% CI 3 to 12) and 14 percent in children (7 to 21), roughly half a day on a week-long cold in an adult. Hemilä and Chalker (BMC Public Health, 2023; PMID 38082300) pooled 15 comparisons from 10 randomized, double-blind Neither the participants nor the people assessing them know who received the real treatment until the trial ends. trials at 1 g a day or more and found colds 15 percent less severe (9 to 21). Many independent trials, consistent in direction, on a self-reported endpoint The outcome a trial measures to decide whether the treatment worked, such as heart attacks, blood pressure or a symptom score., which caps the letter at B. The effect is small, and it applies only to vitamin C taken every day before the cold starts.
As studied, and the trials
Hemilä and Chalker (Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013; PMID 23440782): in the 7 comparisons where vitamin C was started after the cold began, there was no consistent effect on how long the cold lasted or how bad it was. Tested, no benefit.
As studied, and the trials
Hemilä and Chalker (Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013; PMID 23440782): in general community trials with 10,708 participants, the chance of catching a cold was the same on vitamin C and placebo (risk ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.00). Tested, no benefit.
As studied, and the trials
Hemilä and Chalker (Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013; PMID 23440782): in 5 trials with 598 marathon runners, skiers and soldiers on subarctic exercises, colds were about half as common on vitamin C (risk ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.64). The trials are small and the outcome is self-reported, so the letter stays at C.
As studied, and the trials
Physicians' Health Study II (Sesso et al., JAMA, 2008; PMID 18997197): 14,641 men, 500 mg a day for a mean 8 years; major cardiovascular events unchanged (hazard ratio How often an event happened in the treated group compared with the control group over the same period. A ratio of 0.80 means 20 percent fewer events. 0.99, 0.89 to 1.11), and total mortality unchanged (1.07, 0.97 to 1.18). Women's Antioxidant Cardiovascular Study (Cook et al., Arch Intern Med, 2007; PMID 17698683): 8,171 women at high risk, 500 mg a day for a mean 9.4 years; no effect on the combined outcome (relative risk The risk in one group expressed as a share of the risk in another. It can make a small absolute difference look large. 1.02, 0.92 to 1.13). Two large trials in men and women, both null: tested, no benefit.
As studied, and the trials
Physicians' Health Study II (Gaziano et al., JAMA, 2009; PMID 19066368): 14,641 men, 500 mg a day for a mean 8 years; total cancer (hazard ratio 1.01, 0.92 to 1.10) and prostate cancer (1.02, 0.90 to 1.15) unchanged. Women's Antioxidant Cardiovascular Study (Lin et al., J Natl Cancer Inst, 2009; PMID 19116389): 7,627 women, 500 mg a day for an average 9.4 years; total cancer relative risk 1.11 (0.95 to 1.30) and cancer death 1.28 (0.95 to 1.73), neither significant. Two large trials, both null: tested, no benefit.
As studied, and the trials
Juraschek et al. (Am J Clin Nutr, 2012; PMID 22492364) pooled 29 randomized trials, median 500 mg a day for a median 8 weeks, each with 10 to 120 participants: systolic pressure fell 3.84 mmHg (95% CI 2.38 to 5.29) and diastolic 1.48 mmHg. Kosari et al. (Food Funct, 2026; PMID 41784995) re-pooled 17 trials and found about 3.7 mmHg lower systolic pressure, rating the certainty low. Blood pressure is an established stand-in for heart attack and stroke, but every trial is small and short, which holds the letter at C.
As studied, and the trials
Juraschek et al. (Am J Clin Nutr, 2022; PMID 35575611) went back to the Physicians' Health Study II after it ended: men assigned 500 mg a day reported 12 percent fewer new gout diagnoses (hazard ratio 0.88, 0.77 to 0.99). It was an analysis added after the trial, on a self-reported diagnosis, in one trial. In people who already had gout, Stamp et al. (Arthritis Rheum, 2013; PMID 23681955) found 500 mg a day for 8 weeks lowered uric acid by only 0.23 mg/dL, against 1.9 mg/dL for allopurinol. One positive analysis nobody has repeated: C.
As studied, and the trials
Zollinger et al. (Lancet, 1999; PMID 10636366): 123 adults with wrist fractures, 500 mg a day for 50 days; the pain syndrome then called reflex sympathetic dystrophy occurred in 7 percent of wrists on vitamin C against 22 percent on placebo. Zollinger et al. (J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007; PMID 17606778), the same group: 416 patients, 2.4 percent against 10.1 percent, with 500 and 1,500 mg a day both effective. Ekrol et al. (J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014; PMID 25187584), an independent group: 336 patients, 500 mg a day for 50 days, no difference in the syndrome, function or healing at one year. Evaniew et al. (J Orthop Trauma, 2015; PMID 26197022) pooled the three trials, 890 patients: risk ratio 0.45 (0.18 to 1.13), not significant, with low-quality evidence. Positive in one group's trials, null when an independent group repeated it: C.
As studied, and the trials
LOVIT (Lamontagne et al., N Engl J Med, 2022; PMID 35704292): 872 adults with sepsis on vasopressors; death or persistent organ dysfunction at 28 days in 44.5 percent on vitamin C against 38.5 percent on placebo (risk ratio 1.21, 1.04 to 1.40). CITRIS-ALI (Fowler et al., JAMA, 2019; PMID 31573637): 167 adults with sepsis and lung failure; no difference in the organ failure score. C-EASIE (Vandervelden et al., Crit Care, 2025; PMID 40269974): 300 emergency department patients, 1.5 g every 6 hours for 4 days; organ failure 8.7 percent lower, not significant. The largest trial found harm, the others found no benefit: tested, harm found. This is a hospital treatment and says nothing about vitamin C tablets.
As studied, and the trials
VICTORY (Stoppe et al., JAMA, 2026; PMID 42267875): 238 adults with severe burns. Death or persistent organ dysfunction at 28 days occurred in 40.8 percent on vitamin C against 29.7 percent on placebo (risk ratio 1.28, 0.99 to 1.65, P = .06), which crossed the trial's stopping threshold. Death within 28 days was higher on vitamin C, 15.0 against 7.6 percent (risk ratio 1.96, 1.32 to 2.90), and hospital death 23.3 against 16.1 percent. A hospital treatment, tested and possibly harmful; it says nothing about vitamin C tablets.
Read the grade that matches your goal. How EBL grades by use →
- Evidence behind the B
- PMID 23440782 →PMID 38082300 →
A letter describes the human evidence, not the product, the manufacturer, or the ingredient's worth.
See the full evidence record →Vitamin C taken daily for common-cold duration, graded on published human trial evidence.
Why this letter
Why this gradeThe reasoning, and what the grade does not cover.
Grade B on a self-reported endpoint, for common-cold duration with daily supplementation. Hemilä and Chalker (Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013; PMID 23440782) pooled 31 placebo-controlled comparisons with 9,745 cold episodes: colds were 8 percent shorter in adults (95% CI 3 to 12) and 14 percent shorter in children (7 to 21) when vitamin C was taken every day before the cold began. A second pooling of 10 randomized, double-blind trials at 1 g a day or more found colds 15 percent less severe (Hemilä and Chalker, BMC Public Health, 2023; PMID 38082300). The trials come from many independent groups and agree in direction; cold duration is reported by the participants, which caps the letter at B. The effect is small. The same review found no prevention of colds in the general population (risk ratio 0.97) and no consistent effect when vitamin C was started after symptoms began; both are graded D below.
WHAT THIS GRADE DOES NOT COVERheart disease and cancer, tested without benefit in two large trials; blood pressure, gout and wrist-fracture pain syndrome, each graded C; intravenous vitamin C in hospital, which is a different treatment and was harmful in the largest sepsis trial and possibly in severe burns; and correction of scurvy or documented deficiency.
A grade describes the human evidence for a named use. It is not advice, and it is not a judgment on any individual prescription. How the letters are decided →
Dose, form and timing
No dose is published here. This record carries no authored dose, because the cited trials do not converge on a single figure. Each trial cited on this page states the dose it used, and EBL has not turned those into a recommendation.
Standardized extracts were used in the cited trials; product quality varies.
The oral trials gave vitamin C once a day: Sesso et al. (JAMA, 2008; PMID 18997197), Cook et al. (Arch Intern Med, 2007; PMID 17698683) and Ekrol et al. (J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014; PMID 25187584). The intravenous trials gave it every 6 hours: Lamontagne et al. (N Engl J Med, 2022; PMID 35704292) and Stoppe et al. (JAMA, 2026; PMID 42267875). The oral trials do not state a time of day or whether doses were taken with food.
Checked against the published summaries; the full papers could not be read. What the cited trials did, not a schedule. Every supplement, by trial timing →
No laboratory marker tracks the effect graded here; the trials counted cold days and symptoms in participant diaries.
Safety
A history of kidney stones, or kidney disease. In two large cohorts of men, vitamin C supplements of 1,000 mg a day or more went with about 19 percent more kidney stones; no such link was seen in women. At intravenous hospital doses, cases of kidney damage from oxalate crystals and of red blood cell breakdown in people with G6PD deficiency have been reported.
No interaction between oral vitamin C at the trial doses and a common medication rests on a randomized trial. At intravenous hospital doses, high blood vitamin C can make some bedside glucose meters read falsely high, which matters for anyone whose insulin is dosed from those readings.
Intravenous vitamin C and bedside glucose meters. At intravenous hospital doses, high blood vitamin C can make some bedside glucose meters read falsely high. Yanase et al. (Crit Care Med, 2020; PMID 32404636): scoping review of 74 studies of intravenous vitamin C at 6 g a day or more; reported harms included two cases of glucose meter error, five of oxalate kidney damage and three of red blood cell breakdown in G6PD deficiency.
Grade history
How this letter has changed · latest: No. 362 · October 2026 · First graded
Vitamin C now has a record, graded by use. Taken every day before a cold starts, it shortened colds by 8 percent in adults and 14 percent in children (Hemilä and Chalker, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013; PMID 23440782), Grade B; it did not prevent colds in the general population. At 500 mg a day it did not prevent heart disease or cancer in the Physicians' Health Study II (Sesso et al., JAMA, 2008; PMID 18997197). Given intravenously in hospital it raised death or organ dysfunction in sepsis (Lamontagne et al., N Engl J Med, 2022; PMID 35704292) and death in severe burns (Stoppe et al., JAMA, 2026; PMID 42267875).PMID 23440782 PMID 18997197 PMID 35704292 PMID 42267875
Every change to a letter on this site is dated and published. The full evidence log →
Sources
- Citations
- Every paper cited on this page is matched to its PubMed record on every build.
- Retractions
- None of these papers is retracted or under a journal expression of concern. PubMed is checked again on every build.
- Read against the papers
- October 2026. By the EBL editor, Arnold Sandlow, DC.
- Outside review
- Not yet done. No reviewer outside EBL has checked this record.
What each of these checks can and cannot show: evidence integrity.
Primary evidenceEight papers, each linked to its PubMed record.
Hemilä and Chalker (Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013; PMID 23440782): placebo-controlled trials of at least 200 mg a day; daily use shortened colds by 8 percent in adults and 14 percent in children, did not prevent colds in the general community (risk ratio 0.97), halved colds in 598 people under heavy physical stress, and starting vitamin C after symptoms began had no consistent effect. Hemilä and Chalker (BMC Public Health, 2023; PMID 38082300): colds 15 percent less severe at 1 g a day or more. Physicians' Health Study II, Sesso et al. (JAMA, 2008; PMID 18997197) and Gaziano et al. (JAMA, 2009; PMID 19066368): 14,641 men, 500 mg a day for a mean 8 years; no effect on major cardiovascular events, cancer or total mortality. Women's Antioxidant Cardiovascular Study, Cook et al. (Arch Intern Med, 2007; PMID 17698683) and Lin et al. (J Natl Cancer Inst, 2009; PMID 19116389): women at high risk, 500 mg a day for a mean 9.4 years; no effect on cardiovascular events or cancer. LOVIT, Lamontagne et al. (N Engl J Med, 2022; PMID 35704292): intravenous vitamin C in sepsis raised death or persistent organ dysfunction (risk ratio 1.21). VICTORY, Stoppe et al. (JAMA, 2026; PMID 42267875): intravenous vitamin C in severe burns, stopped early, 28-day death 15.0 against 7.6 percent. Grade B for cold duration with daily use rests on many independent trials of a self-reported outcome; the other uses carry their own letters.
How EBL searched for the trials (1 search)
The search that was run, what it returned, and what was left out and why, so the absence of evidence can be checked as well as its presence.
("vitamin C"[ti] OR "ascorbic acid"[ti]) AND ("common cold"[tiab] OR cardiovascular[tiab] OR cancer[tiab] OR "blood pressure"[tiab] OR gout[tiab] OR "complex regional pain syndrome"[tiab] OR sepsis[tiab] OR burn*[tiab]) AND (randomized controlled trial[pt] OR meta-analysis[pt]) AND humans[mesh]Disclosure
Commercial disclosure
EBL earns no commission on any supplement it grades, and there is no dispensary link on this page to earn one from. Grades are assigned by published rubric before any commercial relationship exists and are never influenced by one. Full disclosure.
No dispensary link. EBL’s practitioner dispensary does not carry this item, so there is nothing to link to. Its absence is not a judgment beyond the letter above.
Educational use only · Not medical advice · Starting, stopping or changing any supplement or medication is a decision for your physician
These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. The grade on this page describes the strength of published human trial evidence in the populations studied. It is not a recommendation for any individual and is not medical advice. Starting, stopping or changing any supplement or medication is a decision for your physician.
This page carries a letter. EBL earns $0 on the supplements it grades. No letter has been bought and none is for sale.
How this is enforced
That is not a promise, it is a build condition. Two checks run on every deploy: one refuses to publish if a page says EBL earns a commission on anything that carries a letter, the other refuses if a page names a commercial relationship that is not declared in the register. If either fails, this page does not go live. You can read how the checks work, and what they do not cover, on the evidence integrity page.
Grades move when new trials publish. A free monthly email lists every grade EBL moved, with the reason and the trial behind it: the sign-up is on the Evidence Log →