Protocol · graded by use, five uses
Lipids: lowering LDL cholesterol, and the contrast with raising HDL or lowering triglycerides
Graded on: heart attack, stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death and death from any cause.
At a glance
LDL is the cholesterol that builds up in artery walls. Many large studies lowered it with different medicines, and people had fewer heart attacks and strokes. The more LDL came down, the bigger the drop in heart attacks and strokes. This was true for people who already had heart disease and, by a smaller amount, for people at higher risk who had not. Medicines that raised HDL, the so-called good cholesterol, did not help, and one of them caused more deaths. Lowering another blood fat, triglycerides, with fibrate pills did not help either. No study has tested lowering LDL for decades in young, healthy people.
- What was measured
- Heart attacks, strokes and deaths over about five years.
- How big
- In people with heart or artery disease, deaths fell from 14.7% to 12.9% when LDL Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the cholesterol fraction most closely tied to plaque in the arteries. cholesterol was lowered, about 18 fewer per 1,000.Read from the summary of PMID PubMed ID: the permanent number the US National Library of Medicine gives a published paper. Each one links to that paper's record on PubMed. 12114036.
- Who it applies to
- Adults with heart disease, artery disease, diabetes or raised risk. It does not cover raising good cholesterol, which failed.
- Safety
- The drugs used carry their own side effects; raising HDL cholesterol with one drug caused more deaths.
- Compared with
- Dummy pills, or a less intensive cholesterol-lowering treatment.
- Certainty
- Grade A, resting on: Individual-participant meta-analyses A study that pools the numbers from several trials into one combined estimate. and randomized outcome trials; genetic (Mendelian randomization A method that uses gene variants people are born with as a natural experiment, to test whether a factor causes an outcome.) studies are listed as excluded evidence and carry no letter.
- What would change this grade
- Could move down to B if this trial found no benefit: Large trial or pooled analysis finding that lowering LDL cholesterol does not reduce events. Who: Adults with heart or artery disease. Measured: Heart attack, stroke and death. Length: At least 3 years.
- Cost
- No price recorded yet.
- Sources
- 31 studies cited on this record, listed under Sources.
The A is shared by two of the five uses graded on this record, each on its own evidence. The other three carry their own letters.
This record carries a separate letter for each thing it has been measured on. The headline grade is the best of them, and it does not transfer to the others.
Statins: across 14 randomized trials and 90,056 people, each 1 mmol/L lower LDL cholesterol cut all-cause death by 12% and major vascular events by 21% over about 5 years, which meant 48 fewer people per 1,000 with a major vascular event among those who already had coronary heart disease (Baigent et al., 2005; PMID 16214597). Across 26 trials and about 170,000 people, more intensive statin regimens cut major vascular events a further 15% against less intensive ones, and all-cause death fell 10% per 1 mmol/L (Baigent et al., 2010; PMID 21067804). In 4S, simvastatin in 4,444 people with coronary heart disease cut deaths from 256 (12%) to 182 (8%), relative risk The risk in one group expressed as a share of the risk in another. It can make a small absolute difference look large. 0.70 (PMID 7968073). Non-statin drugs: ezetimibe (IMPROVE-IT, PMID 26039521), evolocumab (FOURIER, PMID 28304224) and alirocumab (ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, PMID 30403574) each reduced events when added to a statin. Across 49 trials and 312,175 people, the risk reduction per 1 mmol/L was 0.77 for statins and 0.75 for diet, bile acid sequestrants, ileal bypass and ezetimibe, with no difference between them (Silverman et al., 2016; PMID 27673306). Replicated The same finding reproduced by a separate research group. A result seen once can be chance or bias; a replicated one is harder to explain away. hard outcomes, several drugs, independent sponsors: A.
Shepherd et al., WOSCOPS (1995; PMID 7566020): pravastatin cut definite coronary events 31% in men with high cholesterol and no previous heart attack. Ridker et al., JUPITER (2008; PMID 18997196): rosuvastatin 20 mg in 17,802 people with LDL below 130 mg per deciliter and raised C-reactive protein halved LDL cholesterol; the primary end point fell (hazard ratio How often an event happened in the treated group compared with the control group over the same period. A ratio of 0.80 means 20 percent fewer events. 0.56) and death from any cause fell (hazard ratio 0.80). Yusuf et al., HOPE-3 (2016; PMID 27040132): 3.7% against 4.8% over a median 5.6 years, which is 11 fewer people per 1,000 (arithmetic on the abstract's percentages). Bohula et al., VESALIUS-CV (2026; PMID 41211925): evolocumab in 12,257 people with atherosclerosis or diabetes but no previous heart attack or stroke; 5-year rate of coronary death, heart attack or ischemic stroke 6.2% against 8.0%, hazard ratio 0.75. Pooled individual data, Mihaylova et al. (2012; PMID 22607822): in people whose 5-year risk was below 10%, each 1 mmol/L lower LDL cholesterol prevented about 11 major vascular events per 1,000 over 5 years; in people without vascular disease all-cause death fell (rate ratio 0.91 per 1 mmol/L). The absolute benefit is about half that seen in people with heart disease: 25 against 48 fewer people with a major vascular event per 1,000 per 1 mmol/L (PMID 16214597). Replicated hard outcomes: A.
Raising HDL cholesterol has been tested in seven large outcome trials of three kinds of drug. Six found no fewer events, and torcetrapib increased deaths (PMID 17984165), even though torcetrapib and evacetrapib also lowered LDL cholesterol by about a quarter to a third. The one CETP inhibitor that reduced events, anacetrapib in REVEAL, Bowman et al. (2017; PMID 28847206), also lowered non-HDL cholesterol by 17 mg per deciliter; major coronary events were 10.8% against 11.8% in 30,449 people. Across trials the CETP inhibitors gave a risk ratio of 1.01 where 0.90 was expected from their LDL lowering alone (Silverman et al., 2016; PMID 27673306). Tested, harm found for torcetrapib, no benefit for the rest: D on Route 2 Human randomized trials have been run and did not show benefit on the stated outcome. One of the two routes to the lowest letter on EBL's scale.. The niacin finding matches EBL's niacin record.
Two trials added a fibrate to statin-era care and found no fewer events, even where triglycerides fell by a quarter (PROMINENT, PMID 36342113; ACCORD Lipid, PMID 20228404). Apolipoprotein B rose 4.8% with pemafibrate. An older meta-analysis of 18 fibrate trials, most not on a statin background, found a 10% reduction in major cardiovascular events (p = 0.048) and 13% in coronary events but no effect on death from any cause or on stroke (Jun et al., 2010; PMID 20462635); that older question is not what this row grades. Tested, no benefit: D on Route 2.
Bhatt et al., REDUCE-IT (2019; PMID 30415628): 8,179 statin-treated people with triglycerides of 135 to 499 mg per deciliter and cardiovascular disease or diabetes with other risk factors; icosapent ethyl 4 g a day cut the primary composite from 22.0% to 17.2% (hazard ratio 0.75) over a median 4.9 years, 48 fewer people per 1,000 (arithmetic on the abstract's percentages), and cardiovascular death from 5.2% to 4.3%. Funded by Amarin, the maker. The placebo An inactive substitute made to look like the real treatment, so participants cannot tell which one they received. was mineral oil, and in that arm LDL cholesterol rose 10.9% and C-reactive protein and other markers rose over the trial while they changed little on icosapent ethyl; the authors call the effect of this on the trial's result uncertain (Ridker et al., 2022; PMID 35762321). Yokoyama et al., JELIS (2007; PMID 17398308), an open-label Everyone in the trial knows which treatment they are receiving, so expectations can shape the results, especially for symptoms people report themselves. trial of purified EPA 1,800 mg plus a statin in 18,645 Japanese people, found 19% fewer major coronary events. Nicholls et al., STRENGTH (2020; PMID 33190147), 4 g a day of an EPA plus DHA carboxylic acid against corn oil in 13,078 people, was stopped with no benefit (hazard ratio 0.99); it tested a different product. One large positive blinded trial, supported by an open-label trial at a lower dose, with a disputed placebo: B, matching the icosapent ethyl use on EBL's omega-3 record. This is not a triglyceride effect that carries to other triglyceride drugs: fibrates lowered triglycerides without fewer events (row above).
Funding: All three randomized trials replicating this Grade A for Heart attack, stroke and death, lowering LDL cholesterol in people with established vascular disease or after an acute coronary syndrome were funded by industry: IMPROVE-IT (PMID 26039521) by Merck, the maker of the product it tested; FOURIER (PMID 28304224) by Amgen, the maker of the product it tested; ODYSSEY OUTCOMES (PMID 30403574) by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, the makers of the product it tested. The funder's role in design and analysis is not stated here, because the full trial reports could not be read. The letter stands because each trial met the grading rules on its own; the funding is stated here so it can be weighed alongside it.
Funding: Both randomized trials replicating this Grade A for Heart attack, stroke and cardiovascular death, lowering LDL cholesterol in people without vascular disease who are at raised risk were funded by industry or funders the reports do not identify: WOSCOPS (PMID 7566020) by a funder the indexed report does not name; HOPE-3 (PMID 27040132) by the maker of the product it tested. The funder's role in design and analysis is not stated here, because the full trial reports could not be read. The letter stands because each trial met the grading rules on its own; the funding is stated here so it can be weighed alongside it.
Lowering LDL cholesterol in people with established vascular disease or after an acute coronary syndrome (A) and in people without vascular disease at raised risk (A). High-dose icosapent ethyl in statin-treated people with raised triglycerides (B). Raising HDL cholesterol (D, tested, harm found with torcetrapib, no benefit with the others) and lowering triglycerides with a fibrate added to a statin (D, tested, no benefit).
Why this letter
Why this gradeThe reasoning, and what the grade does not cover.
Grade A on hard outcomes. LDL cholesterol lowering has been tested on heart attack, stroke and death in dozens of randomized trials, and the result repeats across independent groups and across drugs that lower LDL by different routes: statins (Baigent et al., 2010; PMID 21067804), ezetimibe (Cannon et al., 2015; PMID 26039521), evolocumab (Sabatine et al., 2017; PMID 28304224), alirocumab (Schwartz et al., 2018; PMID 30403574) and bempedoic acid (Nissen et al., 2023; PMID 36876740). The size of the benefit follows the size of the LDL fall, and statins and non-statin drugs that work through the LDL receptor give the same benefit per 1 mmol/L (Silverman et al., 2016; PMID 27673306). That is the reason this record grades the lowering of LDL cholesterol itself rather than one pill. The same pooled data show the contrast: other lipid changes did not reliably translate into fewer events. Raising HDL cholesterol failed in six outcome trials and torcetrapib raised deaths (D, Route 2), fibrates added to a statin lowered triglycerides without fewer events (D, Route 2), and icosapent ethyl's benefit rests on one large trial with a disputed mineral oil placebo (B).
WHAT THIS GRADE DOES NOT COVERthe A attaches to the drugs, doses and populations tested, which were adults with raised cardiovascular risk or established disease, mean age 62 across 49 trials (PMID 27673306). It does not cover low-risk young adults treated for decades, where no randomized trial exists; the case for lifelong lower LDL cholesterol rests on genetic studies, which carry no letter. Bempedoic acid alone did not reduce stroke, cardiovascular death or death from any cause (PMID 36876740). Diet, psyllium, oat beta-glucan and plant sterols are graded on EBL's own records on LDL cholesterol (B), not on events. It does not cover lowering lipoprotein(a): top-line results of the Lp(a)HORIZON outcome trial of pelacarsen reported that the primary end point was not reduced, and full data are awaited (Sabouret et al., 2026; PMID 42880684). Until the full results are published, lipoprotein(a) lowering carries no letter. Statins as a drug are graded on their own record, with their harms.
Shared endpoint The outcome a trial measures to decide whether the treatment worked, such as heart attacks, blood pressure or a symptom score.: Cardiovascular death, heart attack, stroke and related major cardiovascular events after LDL cholesterol was lowered by different drugs, on top of statin therapy
- IMPROVE-IT (Cannon): Ezetimibe added to simvastatin after an acute coronary syndrome: primary composite 32.7% against 34.7% at 7 years, an absolute difference of 2.0 percentage points, 18,144 patients. PMID 26039521 · Funding: manufacturer-funded (Merck)
- FOURIER (Sabatine): Evolocumab on top of a statin lowered LDL cholesterol to a median 30 mg per deciliter; primary composite 9.8% against 11.3%, hazard ratio 0.85, 27,564 patients with atherosclerotic disease. PMID 28304224 · Funding: manufacturer-funded (Amgen)
- ODYSSEY OUTCOMES (Schwartz): Alirocumab after an acute coronary syndrome: primary composite 9.5% against 11.1%, hazard ratio 0.85; deaths 3.5% against 4.1%, 18,924 patients. PMID 30403574 · Funding: manufacturer-funded (Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals)
What the replication does not cover: Three different drugs from three different makers, each trial funded by its maker. The statin trials pooled by the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration, funded by the UK Medical Research Council, the British Heart Foundation and other public bodies (PMID 21067804), show the same reduction per 1 mmol/L of LDL cholesterol lowered.
Shared endpoint: First heart attack, stroke or cardiovascular death in people without known cardiovascular disease
- WOSCOPS (Shepherd), West of Scotland: Pravastatin 40 mg in 6,595 men aged 45 to 64 with high cholesterol: 174 against 248 definite coronary events, a 31 percent relative reduction. PMID 7566020 · Funding: not stated in the indexed abstract
- HOPE-3 (Yusuf), 21 countries: Rosuvastatin 10 mg in 12,705 intermediate-risk people: cardiovascular death, heart attack or stroke 3.7% against 4.8%, hazard ratio 0.76. PMID 27040132 · Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research and AstraZeneca
What the replication does not cover: Different countries, decades, statins and trial groups. HOPE-3 was co-funded by AstraZeneca, the maker of rosuvastatin; the WOSCOPS abstract does not state its funding.
A grade describes the human evidence for a named use. It is not advice, and it is not a judgment on any individual prescription. How the letters are decided →
ClinicalTrials.gov, the public registry run by the U.S. National Library of Medicine, lists studies that are recruiting volunteers. The link below searches it for LDL Cholesterol Lowering among studies recruiting now. EBL has no relationship with any listed study and receives no payment for this link.
Search recruiting studies of LDL Cholesterol Lowering on ClinicalTrials.gov
Evidence notes: meta-analysis of randomized trials, randomized trial, independently replicated
Endpoint graded: Heart attack, stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death and death from any cause (hard)
Last reviewed: October 2026
Each marker links to its entry on the Longevity Lab Panel, which lists every graded record whose trials measured it. Moving a marker is not the same as preventing disease.
- HDL-C: Heart attack, stroke and death, raising HDL cholesterol with CETP inhibitors, niacin or apolipoprotein A1 infusion (Grade D for this use)
Dose, form and timing
Measured outcome: clinical events (heart attack, stroke, revascularization, cardiovascular death, death from any cause) counted by blinded adjudication in the outcome trials. LDL cholesterol was measured along the way and is the quantity the effect is scaled to (per 1 mmol/L, PMID 21067804; PMID 27673306).
As studiedDose, form, population and duration for every use.
A prescription purified EPA. Over-the-counter fish oil is a mixed EPA and DHA product and does not inherit this grade.
A grade describes the intervention that was tested. Where the product on the shelf differs from it, this says so.
Safety
Torcetrapib, a CETP inhibitor, raised blood pressure and increased deaths (hazard ratio 1.58) and was stopped (PMID 17984165). Niacin with laropiprant increased serious adverse events, including disturbed diabetes control, new diabetes, infection and bleeding (PMID 25014686). Pemafibrate was followed by more kidney adverse events and venous thromboembolism (PMID 36342113). Icosapent ethyl led to more hospital stays for atrial fibrillation or flutter (3.1% against 2.1%), with serious bleeding 2.7% against 2.1% (PMID 30415628). Bempedoic acid raised gout (3.1% against 2.1%) and gallstones (2.2% against 1.2%) (PMID 36876740). PCSK9 antibodies caused more injection-site reactions (PMID 28304224; PMID 30403574). Statin harms are on the statin record.
Cautions documented in human studies. Each caution on this record, sorted by what it rests on.
- Torcetrapib (CETP inhibitor): raised blood pressure and increased deaths (hazard ratio 1.58), and was stopped (PMID 17984165)
- Niacin with laropiprant: more serious adverse events, including disturbed diabetes control, new diabetes, infection and bleeding (PMID 25014686)
- Pemafibrate: more kidney adverse events and venous thromboembolism (PMID 36342113)
- Icosapent ethyl: more hospital stays for atrial fibrillation or flutter (3.1% against 2.1%) and serious bleeding (2.7% against 2.1%) (PMID 30415628)
- Bempedoic acid raised gout and gallstones, and PCSK9 antibodies caused more injection-site reactions (PMID 36876740 PMID 28304224 PMID 30403574)
None recorded.
None recorded.
None recorded.
Does not apply: human harm data are listed above.
Grade history
How this letter has changedLatest: No. 394 · October 2026 · First graded.
Lipids: lowering LDL cholesterol, and the contrast with raising HDL or lowering triglycerides now has its own record, graded use by use after a full PubMed search in October 2026: Heart attack, stroke and death, lowering LDL cholesterol in people with established vascular disease or after an acute coronary syndrome (A); Heart attack, stroke and cardiovascular death, lowering LDL cholesterol in people without vascular disease who are at raised risk (A); Heart attack, stroke and death, raising HDL cholesterol with CETP inhibitors, niacin or apolipoprotein A1 infusion (D); Heart attack, stroke and cardiovascular death, lowering triglycerides with a fibrate added to a statin (D); Major cardiovascular events, high-dose icosapent ethyl in statin-treated people with raised triglycerides (B). Lowering LDL cholesterol in people with established vascular disease or after an acute coronary syndrome (A) and in people without vascular disease at raised risk (A). High-dose icosapent ethyl in statin-treated people with raised triglycerides (B). Raising HDL cholesterol (D, tested, harm found with torcetrapib, no benefit with the others) and lowering triglycerides with a fibrate added to a statin (D, tested, no benefit). Applied the written grade definitions under the editor's standing instruction of October 2026 (Arnold Sandlow, D.C.).PMID 16214597 PMID 21067804 PMID 7968073 PMID 26039521 PMID 28304224 PMID 30403574 PMID 27673306 PMID 7566020 PMID 18997196 PMID 27040132 PMID 22607822 PMID 41211925
Every change to a letter on this site is dated and published. The full evidence log →
Sources
- Citations
- Every paper cited on this page is matched to its PubMed record on every build.
- Retractions
- None of these papers is retracted or under a journal expression of concern. PubMed is checked again on every build.
- Read against the papers
- October 2026. By a language model (AI-assisted reading), not yet reviewed by a clinician.
- Outside review
- Not yet done. No reviewer outside EBL has checked this record.
What each of these checks can and cannot show: evidence integrity.
The evidence, in full31 papers, each linked to its PubMed record.
Baigent et al., Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (The Lancet, 2005; PMID 16214597): 14 randomized statin trials, 90,056 participants, mean 5 years; per 1 mmol/L lower LDL cholesterol, all-cause death 12% lower (rate ratio 0.88), coronary death 19% lower, major vascular events 21% lower (0.79); 48 fewer people per 1,000 with a major vascular event among those with coronary heart disease and 25 fewer per 1,000 among those without; no increase in cancer. Baigent et al., Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (The Lancet, 2010; PMID 21067804): 26 trials, about 170,000 participants; more intensive statin regimens cut major vascular events a further 15%; all-cause death 10% lower per 1 mmol/L (rate ratio 0.90); no threshold within the range studied, including LDL below 2 mmol/L. Mihaylova et al., Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaborators (The Lancet, 2012; PMID 22607822): 27 trials; in people with 5-year risk below 10%, about 11 fewer major vascular events per 1,000 over 5 years per 1 mmol/L; in people without vascular disease, all-cause death rate ratio 0.91 per 1 mmol/L. Older people, Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (The Lancet, 2019; PMID 30712900): 28 trials, 186,854 participants, 14,483 older than 75; major vascular events fell in every age group, with less direct evidence in people older than 75 without vascular disease. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group, 4S (The Lancet, 1994; PMID 7968073): 4,444 people with coronary heart disease, deaths 256 (12%) on placebo against 182 (8%) on simvastatin, relative risk 0.70. Pravastatin, LIPID Study Group (New England Journal of Medicine, 1998; PMID 9841303): pravastatin in 9,014 people after a heart attack or unstable angina; overall mortality 14.1% against 11.0%. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (The Lancet, 2002; PMID 12114036): simvastatin 40 mg in 20,536 high-risk adults; deaths 12.9% against 14.7%, major vascular events 19.8% against 25.2%. Cannon et al., IMPROVE-IT (New England Journal of Medicine, 2015; PMID 26039521): ezetimibe added to simvastatin after an acute coronary syndrome, 18,144 patients, 32.7% against 34.7% at 7 years, hazard ratio 0.936. Sabatine et al., FOURIER (New England Journal of Medicine, 2017; PMID 28304224): evolocumab in 27,564 patients, 9.8% against 11.3%, hazard ratio 0.85. Schwartz et al., ODYSSEY OUTCOMES (New England Journal of Medicine, 2018; PMID 30403574): alirocumab in 18,924 patients after an acute coronary syndrome, 9.5% against 11.1%, hazard ratio 0.85. Nissen et al., CLEAR Outcomes (New England Journal of Medicine, 2023; PMID 36876740): bempedoic acid in 13,970 statin-intolerant patients with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease; 11.7% against 13.3%, hazard ratio 0.87; no significant effect on stroke, cardiovascular death or death from any cause. Bohula et al., VESALIUS-CV (New England Journal of Medicine, 2026; PMID 41211925): evolocumab in 12,257 people without a previous heart attack or stroke, hazard ratio 0.75. Shepherd et al., WOSCOPS (New England Journal of Medicine, 1995; PMID 7566020); Ridker et al., JUPITER (New England Journal of Medicine, 2008; PMID 18997196); Yusuf et al., HOPE-3 (New England Journal of Medicine, 2016; PMID 27040132): statins in people without vascular disease, each positive on its primary end point. Silverman et al. (JAMA, 2016; PMID 27673306): meta-regression of 49 trials, 312,175 participants; risk ratio per 1 mmol/L 0.77 for statins and 0.75 for diet, bile acid sequestrants, ileal bypass and ezetimibe; CETP inhibitors gave less benefit than their LDL lowering predicted. Contrast trials (raising HDL, lowering triglycerides, icosapent ethyl) are listed in the rows below.
How EBL searched for the trials (1 search)
The search that was run, what it returned, and what was left out and why, so the absence of evidence can be checked as well as its presence.
("LDL cholesterol"[tiab] OR "low-density lipoprotein"[tiab] OR HDL[tiab] OR triglyceride*[tiab]) AND (lowering[tiab] OR raising[tiab]) AND ("cardiovascular events"[tiab] OR "major vascular events"[tiab] OR mortality[tiab]) AND (randomized controlled trial[pt] OR meta-analysis[pt])PubMed watch: does a new study change the grade? (nothing new)
No new paper matching the searches behind this grade has been added to PubMed since October 2026.
Last run October 2026. A letter on EBL moves only after a logged review. A new paper never moves a letter by arriving: it is read, the answer is written here, and any change to the letter is published in the evidence log.
Disclosure
Educational use only · Not medical advice · EBL grades published human evidence and does not recommend treatment. Stopping a prescription is a decision for your physician.
Evidence Based Longevity, Inc. is owner-operated and edited by Arnold Sandlow, D.C., a California-licensed chiropractor. Evidence Based Longevity publishes in English only · Machine translations are not produced or reviewed by EBL for accuracy
© Evidence Based Longevity, Inc. All rights reserved
These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. Any grade on this page describes the strength of published human trial evidence in the populations studied. It is not a recommendation for any individual and is not medical advice. Starting, stopping or changing any supplement or medication is a decision for your physician.
Grades move when new trials publish. A free monthly email lists every grade EBL moved, with the reason and the trial behind it: the sign-up is on the Evidence Log →