Skip to main content
Evidence Based Longevity (EBL)Check what I take
← All protocols
B

Protocol

Mobility and fall-prevention protocols

A network meta-analysis A study that pools the numbers from several trials into one combined estimate. of 21 randomized trials in 3,387 older adults ranked Falls Management Exercise and the Otago program highest for reducing falls, with a reverse U-shaped dose response peaking near 420 MET-minutes per week.

Compare this record with another, side by side →

In plain words

These are exercise programs that build balance and strength in older adults. A review of 21 studies in 3,387 older adults found that structured fall-prevention exercise and the Otago program cut falls the most. A separate review of 21 studies found that Tai Chi improved balance and fall risk compared with no exercise. People in exercise studies know which group they are in, which limits how sure the results can be. The reviews did not look at broken bones or deaths.

B Grade B

A network meta-analysis of 21 randomized trials in 3,387 older adults ranked Falls Management Exercise and the Otago program highest for reducing falls, with a reverse U-shaped dose response peaking near 420 MET-minutes per week. A separate meta-analysis of 21 trials found Tai Chi improved balance and fall-risk measures against non-exercise controls.

Why this gradeThe reasoning, and what the grade does not cover.
Why this grade

Grade B on falls and fall risk in older adults. A network meta-analysis of 21 randomized trials in 3,387 older adults ranked structured fall-prevention exercise and the Otago program highest for reducing falls (Cheng et al., 2026; PMID PubMed ID: the permanent number the US National Library of Medicine gives a published paper. Each one links to that paper's record on PubMed. 41110662), and a meta-analysis of 21 trials found Tai Chi improved balance and fall-risk measures against non-exercise controls (Dong et al., 2026; PMID 41567791).

WHY NOT Afalls are a hard outcome, but a grade change requires blinded trials, and exercise trials cannot blind the people taking part.

WHAT THIS GRADE DOES NOT COVERfracture or mortality outcomes, which the cited reviews did not grade, and any single program over another beyond the ranking those reviews report.

A grade describes the human evidence for a named use. It is not advice, and it is not a judgment on any individual prescription. How the letters are decided →

The evidence, in fullTwo papers, each linked to its PubMed record.
The evidence

Cheng et al. (Aging Research Reviews, 2026; PMID 41110662): network meta-analysis of 21 randomized trials, 3,387 older adults; the Falls Management Exercise program ranked highest, then Otago, aquatic exercise, Tai Chi and balance training, with benefit peaking near 420 MET-minutes a week. Dong et al. (Frontiers in Public Health, 2026; PMID 41567791): meta-analysis of 21 randomized trials in healthy older adults; Tai Chi improved balance and fall-risk measures against non-exercise controls; fall counts were not pooled. Grade B.

What to track

The 30-second sit-to-stand test and timed-up-and-go (TUG) at baseline and every 8 weeks: both are validated predictors of fall risk. Balance confidence using the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale monthly. In populations with prior falls, record fall frequency over 6-month blocks compared to baseline history.

Evidence notes: meta-analysis, randomized trial

Endpoint The outcome a trial measures to decide whether the treatment worked, such as heart attacks, blood pressure or a symptom score. graded: Falls in older adults (hard)

Last reviewed: October 2026

Educational use only · Not medical advice · EBL grades published human evidence and does not recommend treatment. Stopping a prescription is a decision for your physician.

As studiedDose, form, population and duration for every use.
As studied
FormSupervised exercise programs: the Falls Management Exercise Program (FaME), the Otago Exercise Program, aquatic exercise, Tai Chi and balance training (Cheng 2025, PMID 41110662). Tai Chi in several styles, most often Yang-style 24-form and simplified 24-form, compared with no exercise (Dong 2026, PMID 41567791).
DoseBenefit for fall outcomes peaked at about 420 MET-minutes per week, with the best dose differing by exercise type (Cheng 2025, PMID 41110662). Tai Chi sessions lasted 20 to 90 minutes, 1 to 7 times per week, most commonly 2 or 3 times (Dong 2026, PMID 41567791, full text).
Population21 RCTs Randomized controlled trial: people are assigned to the treatment or a comparison by chance, so the groups differ only in what they received. It is the design that can show cause and effect. with 3,387 older adults (Cheng 2025, PMID 41110662). 21 RCTs with 2,408 healthy adults aged 60 and over with no Tai Chi practice in the prior 6 months, study mean ages about 60 to 86 years, severe acute or chronic disease excluded (Dong 2026, PMID 41567791, full text).
DurationTai Chi programs ran 4 to 26 weeks, with two studies longer than 26 weeks; effects were clearest in programs of 10 to 26 weeks (Dong 2026, PMID 41567791, full text). Program length in the network meta-analysis is not stated in its abstract (Cheng 2025, PMID 41110662).

A grade describes the intervention that was tested. Where the product on the shelf differs from it, this says so.

Evidence Based Longevity, Inc. is owner-operated and edited by Arnold Sandlow, D.C., a California-licensed chiropractor. Evidence Based Longevity publishes in English only · Machine translations are not produced or reviewed by EBL for accuracy

© Evidence Based Longevity, Inc.. All rights reserved

Medical disclaimer

These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. Any grade on this page describes the strength of published human trial evidence in the populations studied. It is not a recommendation for any individual and is not medical advice. Starting, stopping or changing any supplement or medication is a decision for your physician.

How EBL searched for the trials (1 search)

The search that was run, what it returned, and what was left out and why, so the absence of evidence can be checked as well as its presence.

Searched PubMed in October 2026. 183 records screened, 76 eligible for the graded claim.
Query: (exercise[tiab] OR "tai chi"[tiab] OR "balance training"[tiab]) AND (falls[tiab] OR "fall rate"[tiab] OR "rate of falls"[tiab]) AND (older[tiab] OR elderly[tiab]) AND meta-analysis[pt]
Eligibility was judged by title for all 183 records (exercise, Tai Chi or balance interventions with falls, fall injuries or fractures as an outcome in older adults, pooled from RCTs); 76 met it. Read in full abstract: PMID 30703272 (Sherrington 2019 Cochrane), PMID 38833257 (Guirguis-Blake 2024 USPSTF), PMID 27477031 (Zhao 2017), PMID 24169944 (El-Khoury 2013), PMID 30592475 (de Souto Barreto 2019), PMID 28167744 (Huang 2017), PMID 38472538 (Lin 2024), PMID 42718525 (Ge 2026), plus the two cited records PMID 41110662 and PMID 41567791. Screened out (107): multifactorial-only or hospital interventions, fear-of-falling and balance-only outcomes, sarcopenia Age-related loss of muscle mass and strength., osteoporosis bone outcomes, hip fracture rehabilitation, prevalence studies, cost-effectiveness, adherence and outcome-reporting reviews, and non-falls physical function reviews.

Grades move when new trials publish. A free monthly email lists every grade EBL moved, with the reason and the trial behind it: the sign-up is on the Evidence Log →