Skip to main content
Evidence Based Longevity (EBL)Check what I take
Evidence Trace, complete trial record
In plain terms

In plain terms: Sulforaphane (Broccoli Sprout Extract) shows early signals in human research but the evidence is limited -- small trials, surrogate endpoints, or not yet independently replicated. It is an emerging area, not yet a proven one.

Sulforaphane (Broccoli Sprout Extract)

C Limited: small, mixed or unreplicated trials
Category Supplements
Evidence Randomized controlled trials, small and short, mixed
Reviewed July 2026
PMIDs 22537070 · 28615356 · 21559038 · 21372038 · 27832073 · 25313065 · 39929977 · 20805984 · 37619675 · 38772511 · 22325157
The endpoint this grade is based on: Surrogate biomarker endpoint, Glucose control and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes, on small short trials: one 4-week Tehran trial of 10 g/day broccoli sprout powder lowered insulin and HOMA-IR, and a Swedish trial of a concentrated sprout extract lowered fasting glucose and HbA1c in obese patients with poorly controlled diabetes, a subgroup. The same Swedish group's prediabetes trial missed its prespecified primary endpoint. NRF2 activation, the proposed mechanism, did not show in two of three randomized trials that measured it, and the one hypertension trial found no change in endothelial function or blood pressure.

The evidence as the record states it

Bahadoran et al. (Int J Food Sci Nutr, 2012; PMID 22537070): 81 patients with type 2 diabetes in Tehran, 10 or 5 g/day broccoli sprout powder or placebo for 4 weeks; serum insulin and HOMA-IR fell at 10 g/day. The same trial was reported twice more: Bahadoran et al. (Eur J Clin Nutr, 2011; PMID 21559038) on oxidative stress markers and Bahadoran et al. (Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2012; PMID 22325157) on triglycerides and oxidized LDL. Three papers, one 81-patient trial; they do not replicate each other. Axelsson et al. (Sci Transl Med, 2017; PMID 28615356): a concentrated broccoli sprout extract reduced fasting glucose and HbA1c in obese patients with dysregulated type 2 diabetes, which the abstract states as the group in which the effect appeared, so it is a subgroup result. Dwibedi et al. (Nat Microbiol, 2025; PMID 39929977): the same Lund group, 74 drug-naive adults with prediabetes, 12 weeks; the prespecified primary endpoint (a 0.3 mmol/L fall in fasting glucose) was missed, with an overall fall of 0.2 mmol/L; two authors hold patents on sulforaphane for hepatic glucose production licensed to a company in which one holds stock, and the extract's manufacturer supplied the product and placebo. NULL FINDINGS on the mechanism: Wise et al. (PLoS One, 2016; PMID 27832073), 89 patients with COPD, 4 weeks, no effect on Nrf2 target gene expression; Ribeiro et al. (J Ren Nutr, 2024; PMID 37619675), 30 hemodialysis patients, crossover, no change in NRF2 or NF-kB mRNA; Ribeiro et al. (Free Radic Biol Med, 2024; PMID 38772511), non-dialysis chronic kidney disease, NRF2 and NQO1 mRNA rose at 400 micrograms/day for one month, the one positive. Christiansen et al. (PLoS One, 2010; PMID 20805984): 40 adults with hypertension, 10 g/day dried broccoli sprouts for 4 weeks; no improvement in flow-mediated dilation or blood pressure. Singh et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014; PMID 25313065): randomized placebo-controlled trial in autism spectrum disorder, a different population and question, not graded here. Egner et al. (Cancer Prev Res (Phila), 2011; PMID 21372038): bioavailability crossover of two sprout beverages in Qidong, China; grades nothing. Grade C: small, short, partly subgroup-driven and inconsistent surrogate results.

PMID 22537070 PMID 28615356 PMID 21559038 PMID 21372038 PMID 27832073 PMID 25313065 PMID 39929977 PMID 20805984 PMID 37619675 PMID 38772511 PMID 22325157

Why Grade C and not Grade B

Grade C reflects early or limited human evidence -- small trials, surrogate endpoints, or preliminary findings not yet independently replicated. The evidence points in a promising direction but does not yet meet the standard for Grade B. A single well-powered, independently replicated trial with a meaningful endpoint would move this to Grade B or higher.

What would move this grade

A well-powered randomized trial with an objective, clinically meaningful primary endpoint and at least one independent replication would support Grade B or higher.

How to track whether this is working The trials measured the clinical target rather than any sulforaphane-specific biomarker; no validated sulforaphane marker exists.