Skip to main content
Evidence Based Longevity (EBL)Check what I take
Evidence Trace, complete trial record
In plain terms

In plain terms: this entry is Grade D. See the evidence record below for the full picture.

Spermidine

D Not shown: no human trial shows benefit
Category Supplements
Evidence Animal + observational for aging (D Route 1); randomized trial null for memory (D Route 2); pharmacokinetic trials
Reviewed July 2026
PMIDs 27841876 · 29955838 · 35616942 · 30388439 · 37111071 · 39405978 · 33211152 · 42169618
The endpoint this grade is based on: Hard clinical endpoint (mortality, major event), No randomized trial of spermidine on lifespan or mortality has been run. A 12-month randomized trial in older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SmartAge) found no effect on memory. Route 1: animal lifespan data plus observational epidemiology.

The evidence as the record states it

Eisenberg et al. (Nature Medicine, 2016; PMID 27841876): cardioprotection and lifespan extension in MICE. Kiechl et al. (Am J Clin Nutr, 2018; PMID 29955838): higher dietary spermidine associated with lower mortality (observational). Schwarz et al. (JAMA Netw Open, 2022; PMID 35616942): SmartAge, 100 older adults, 12 months, spermidine-rich supplement; no effect on memory or biomarkers. Authors of the mouse study and of SmartAge held equity in the company that makes the supplement tested. D Route 1 for lifespan and mortality. Wirth et al. (Cortex, 2018; PMID 30388439): the 3-month pilot that preceded SmartAge, 30 adults, a moderate within-group memory gain reported by effect size. Memory in older adults with subjective cognitive decline is graded as its own use: tested for a year, no benefit, D on Route 2. Senekowitsch et al. (Nutrients, 2023; PMID 37111071): 12 healthy adults, triple-blind crossover, 15 mg/day for 5 days; plasma spermidine did not change, plasma spermine rose. Keohane et al. (Nutr Res, 2024; PMID 39405978): 37 men aged 50 to 70, 40 mg/day of purified spermidine for up to 28 days; safe, with minimal change in serum and urine polyamines; two authors are employees of the maker of the purified product and the others received its funding. Pekar et al. (Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2021; PMID 33211152): 85 nursing-home residents, higher against lower spermidine intake for 3 months; the abstract reports a 2.2-point MMSE gain in mild dementia and describes no placebo arm, so it does not alter the null. Alsaleh et al. (Aging Cell, 2026; PMID 42169618): 40 adults over 65, 6 mg/day for 13 weeks after a COVID-19 vaccine dose; antibody and B-cell responses improved in vaccine non-responders, immune markers rather than a graded endpoint; part-funded by the wheat germ product's maker, with two authors consulting for it.

PMID 27841876 PMID 29955838 PMID 35616942 PMID 30388439 PMID 37111071 PMID 39405978 PMID 33211152 PMID 42169618

Evidence by specific use

Aging, longevity, mortality
Grade D
Animal lifespan data and observational dietary epidemiology only. No human randomized trial reports an aging, longevity or mortality outcome.
PMID 27841876 PMID 29955838
PMID 27841876 PMID 29955838
Memory in older adults with subjective cognitive decline
Grade D
SmartAge (Schwarz et al., JAMA Netw Open, 2022; PMID 35616942) is the 12-month randomized trial; the 3-month pilot (Wirth et al., Cortex, 2018; PMID 30388439) reported a within-group gain in 30 people. Tested for a year, no benefit: D on Route 2. Pekar et al. (2021; PMID 33211152) compared higher with lower intake in 85 nursing-home residents with dementia for 3 months without a described placebo arm; it reports an MMSE gain in mild dementia and does not change the null.
PMID 35616942 PMID 30388439 PMID 33211152
PMID 35616942 PMID 30388439 PMID 33211152

Why Grade D Route by_use and not Grade C

See the evidence record above for the basis of Grade D.

What would move this grade

See the evidence record above.

How to track whether this is working If spermidine is used for cognitive aging, track cognition with the same validated memory/neuropsychological test over time. Subjective 'energy' and 'immune resilience' are not evidence-based response markers. There is no validated routine blood biomarker for spermidine efficacy.