In plain terms: RIMSO-50 (Dimethyl Sulfoxide Bladder Instillation) has some human trial evidence supporting it, but the evidence is not yet strong enough for EBL to call it established. It is worth knowing about and worth discussing with your clinician.
RIMSO-50 (Dimethyl Sulfoxide Bladder Instillation)
The evidence as the record states it
Perez-Marrero et al. (Journal of Urology, 1988; PMID 3288775): randomized crossover trial, 33 patients with biopsies suggestive of interstitial cystitis, 50% DMSO versus saline; 53% markedly improved on DMSO versus 18% on saline, and 93% versus 35% on objective improvement. Yoshimura et al. (International Journal of Urology, 2021; PMID 33580603): multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Japanese patients with bladder-centric interstitial cystitis; the symptom index fell 5.2 points on DMSO and 3.4 on placebo at 12 weeks. Li et al. (Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2025; PMID 40205912): meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials and 9 single-arm or cohort studies, 554 patients; adverse events in 37.6%, mostly mild. Tutolo et al. (International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 2017; PMID 28124536): DMSO versus chondroitin sulfate 2%, chondroitin better, high DMSO withdrawal. Moss et al. (Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2023; PMID 36747494): DMSO with triamcinolone versus bupivacaine, triamcinolone and heparin in newly diagnosed women.
Why Grade B and not Grade A
Grade B reflects moderate human evidence -- typically a single strong trial, multiple smaller trials, or surrogate endpoint data without hard clinical outcome replication. To reach Grade A, RIMSO-50 (Dimethyl Sulfoxide Bladder Instillation) would require at least one additional independent randomized trial demonstrating a hard clinical endpoint or objectively measured functional outcome in a comparable population.
What this grade covers and what it does not
What would move this grade
An independent randomized trial demonstrating a hard clinical endpoint -- mortality, major adverse event, or objectively confirmed functional improvement -- in an adequately powered sample, with results independently replicated, would support Grade A.
How this was studied
Form: RIMSO-50, 50% dimethyl sulfoxide solution, instilled into the bladder by catheter, versus saline or placebo · Dose: 50 mL of 50% DMSO held in the bladder for about 15 minutes; every 2 weeks for two courses of four instillations (1988 trial) · Population: 33 patients with biopsies suggestive of interstitial cystitis, 30 women and 3 men, mean age 48 (United States); Japanese adults with bladder-centric interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (Japan) · Duration: Two 4-instillation courses in the crossover trial; 12 weeks in the Japanese trial · What is sold differs: A prescription product given in a clinic by a urologist or gynecologist. It is not the DMSO sold as a liquid or gel, and the trials say nothing about those.