In plain terms: Padma Basic (Tibetan multi-herb formula) shows early signals in human research but the evidence is limited -- small trials, surrogate endpoints, or not yet independently replicated. It is an emerging area, not yet a proven one.
Padma Basic (Tibetan multi-herb formula)
The evidence as the record states it
Stewart et al. (Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016; PMID 27021597): five placebo-controlled randomized trials, 365 participants, at least 16 weeks; walking distance rose within the Padma 28 groups, and two trials (193 participants) pooled showed maximum walking distance 96 m higher than placebo, rated very low quality evidence; small trials, limited between-group statistics, withdrawal linked to the outcome and evidence of publication bias; no effect on ankle brachial index. Melzer et al. (Atherosclerosis, 2006; PMID 16600251): earlier pooled analysis of the same trials, positive. Grade C: the trials are small and the Cochrane review rates the evidence very low quality and asks for well-designed research.
Why Grade C and not Grade B
Grade C reflects early or limited human evidence -- small trials, surrogate endpoints, or preliminary findings not yet independently replicated. The evidence points in a promising direction but does not yet meet the standard for Grade B. A single well-powered, independently replicated trial with a meaningful endpoint would move this to Grade B or higher.
What this grade covers and what it does not
What would move this grade
A well-powered randomized trial with an objective, clinically meaningful primary endpoint and at least one independent replication would support Grade B or higher.