In plain terms: Niacin (extended-release, for lipids) has been tested in human trials aimed at the relevant outcome and did not show benefit at the doses and durations studied. The animal research may be encouraging, but it has not yet translated to humans in these trials.
Niacin (extended-release, for lipids)
The evidence as the record states it
Boden et al., AIM-HIGH (NEJM, 2011; PMID 22085343): 3,414 patients with established cardiovascular disease on simvastatin, extended-release niacin 1,500 to 2,000 mg/day alone against placebo; stopped after 3 years for lack of efficacy, primary events 16.4 against 16.2 percent (hazard ratio 1.02) despite higher HDL and lower triglycerides; funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Abbott, the product's maker. Landray et al., HPS2-THRIVE (NEJM, 2014; PMID 25014686): 25,673 adults with vascular disease on statin-based therapy after a run-in that excluded people who could not tolerate niacin, 2 g extended-release niacin with 40 mg laropiprant in one pill against placebo for a median of 3.9 years; major vascular events 13.2 against 13.7 percent, not significant; serious adverse events increased; funded by Merck, the combination's maker, with the trial run by Oxford. Haynes et al. (Clin Ther, 2019; PMID 31447131): the HPS2-THRIVE adverse-effect report; new-onset diabetes hazard ratio 1.32, with excess disturbances of diabetes control, bleeding, infection and gastrointestinal events; the pill combined two drugs, so the harms cannot be assigned to niacin alone. Schandelmaier et al. (Cochrane, 2017; PMID 28616955): 23 trials, 39,195 people, median dose 2 g/day; no reduction in overall mortality (RR 1.05, high quality), cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke, and more discontinuations for side effects. Canner et al. (J Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; PMID 3782631): the Coronary Drug Project, immediate-release niacin alone in men with prior infarction before statins existed; fewer nonfatal reinfarctions and 11 percent lower 15-year mortality, the reason this record excludes immediate-release preparations rather than grading them. D Route 2: tested, no benefit; harm signal in the combination trial.
Trials showing no benefit
High. Stopped early for lack of efficacy; hazard ratio 1.02 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.21) despite HDL raised and triglycerides lowered. Funded by NHLBI and Abbott, the product's maker.
High. Events 13.2 against 13.7 percent, not significant. Serious adverse events increased (new-onset diabetes HR 1.32, bleeding, infection, gastrointestinal), a harm signal that belongs to the niacin-laropiprant combination and cannot be assigned to niacin alone.
Why Grade D Route 2 and not Grade C
Grade D Route 2 applies when a compound has been tested in humans and benefit was not shown. Niacin (extended-release, for lipids) has been tested in 2 human trials on endpoints relevant to the claim being evaluated, and the primary endpoint was not met.
A randomized, placebo-controlled trial pre-specifying a meaningful clinical or functional endpoint and demonstrating statistically significant benefit would move this to Grade C or higher, depending on effect size, population size, and whether it is independently replicated.
What this grade covers and what it does not
What would move this grade
A randomized, placebo-controlled trial pre-specifying a clinical aging endpoint and demonstrating statistically significant benefit on that primary endpoint would be sufficient to move this to Grade C or higher, depending on effect size and population.