In plain terms: Glutathione (Oral) shows early signals in human research but the evidence is limited -- small trials, surrogate endpoints, or not yet independently replicated. It is an emerging area, not yet a proven one.
Glutathione (Oral)
The evidence as the record states it
Richie et al. (Eur J Nutr, 2015; PMID 24791752): randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 54 non-smoking adults, 250 or 1,000 mg/day standard oral glutathione for 6 months; blood, erythrocyte, plasma and lymphocyte glutathione rose 30 to 35 percent at the high dose, the oxidized-to-reduced ratio fell, and natural killer cytotoxicity rose; funding is not stated in the indexed record, and an ingredient maker lists this as its study, so the trial is not called independent here. Against: Allen and Bradley (J Altern Complement Med, 2011; PMID 21875351): randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 40 healthy adults, 1,000 mg/day for 4 weeks, NIH-funded; no change in urinary F2-isoprostanes or 8-OHdG, the primary endpoints, and no change in erythrocyte glutathione, oxidized glutathione or their ratio. Søndergård et al. (Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2021; PMID 33740389): randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 20 obese adults with and without type 2 diabetes, 1,000 mg/day for 3 weeks; whole-body insulin sensitivity by clamp improved, muscle glutathione rose numerically without a change in the redox ratio, and no oxidative stress marker changed. Form: Sinha et al. (Eur J Clin Nutr, 2018; PMID 28853742) is a 12-person uncontrolled pilot of liposomal glutathione funded by a company that sells liposomal glutathione; a different form, and it cannot carry a grade. Grade C: mixed small trials on biomarker endpoints.
Why Grade C and not Grade B
Grade C reflects early or limited human evidence -- small trials, surrogate endpoints, or preliminary findings not yet independently replicated. The evidence points in a promising direction but does not yet meet the standard for Grade B. A single well-powered, independently replicated trial with a meaningful endpoint would move this to Grade B or higher.
What this grade covers and what it does not
What would move this grade
A well-powered randomized trial with an objective, clinically meaningful primary endpoint and at least one independent replication would support Grade B or higher.