Skip to main content
Evidence Based Longevity (EBL)Check what I take
Evidence Trace, complete trial record
In plain terms

In plain terms: Folic Acid (supplemental, 1 mg/day) has been tested in human trials aimed at the relevant outcome and did not show benefit at the doses and durations studied. The animal research may be encouraging, but it has not yet translated to humans in these trials.

Folic Acid (supplemental, 1 mg/day)

D Not shown: no human trial shows benefit
Route 2 — tested in humans; benefit not shown
Category Supplements
Evidence Randomized controlled trials + pooled analysis (no benefit, D Route 2)
Reviewed July 2026
PMIDs 17551129 · 19864409 · 18022173 · 21170989 · 31401653 · 23352552 · 23682073
The endpoint this grade is based on: Hard clinical endpoint (mortality, major event), Tested for colorectal adenoma recurrence in three placebo-controlled trials and a pooled analysis of 2,632 patients. No reduction. The largest trial raised the possibility of more advanced neoplasia, and its long-term follow-up found more sessile serrated lesions with extended use; no overall cancer increase was found across 13 trials.

The evidence as the record states it

Cole et al. (JAMA, 2007; PMID 17551129): the Aspirin/Folate Polyp Prevention Study, 1,021 adults with a prior colorectal adenoma, 1 mg/day folic acid for 3 then up to 6 years; adenoma recurrence not reduced, with a possible increase in advanced and multiple neoplasia flagged for further study. Wu et al. (Am J Clin Nutr, 2009; PMID 19864409): independent placebo-controlled trial in 672 participants of two cohorts, 1 mg/day for 3 to 6.5 years; recurrence not reduced overall (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.13), with a reduction only in those with low baseline plasma folate and no sign of the increase seen in Cole 2007. Logan et al. (Gastroenterology, 2008; PMID 18022173): ukCAP, 945 patients, 0.5 mg/day for about 3 years; no effect on recurrence (RR 1.07). Figueiredo et al. (Int J Cancer, 2011; PMID 21170989): pooled analysis of the three trials, 2,632 patients, RR 0.98 for all adenomas and 1.06 for advanced lesions. Passarelli et al. (Am J Clin Nutr, 2019; PMID 31401653): long-term follow-up of the Cole trial; with extended treatment, sessile serrated lesions were more frequent on folic acid during the second surveillance interval (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.68), a signal that did not persist after treatment stopped. Vollset et al. (Lancet, 2013; PMID 23352552): meta-analysis of 13 trials, 49,621 participants; folic acid did not increase overall cancer incidence during the trials. Gao et al. (Cancer Prev Res, 2013; PMID 23682073): open trial without placebo in Chinese adults over 50 with no adenoma; fewer first adenomas on 1 mg/day; it tests initial occurrence, a different question from recurrence, and does not change the headline. D Route 2 on adenoma recurrence: tested in three trials and pooled, no benefit.

PMID 17551129 PMID 19864409 PMID 18022173 PMID 21170989 PMID 31401653 PMID 23352552 PMID 23682073

Trials showing no benefit

Endpoint
Incidence of colorectal adenoma and advanced adenoma
Population
1,021 adults with prior colorectal adenoma, 1 mg/day, colonoscopic surveillance over 3 and 6 years
No benefit shown

Moderate to high. Randomized placebo-controlled trial. No reduction. Authors flagged a possible increase in neoplasia requiring further study.

Endpoint
Recurrent colorectal adenoma
Population
672 adults with prior adenoma from two cohorts, 1 mg/day for 3 to 6.5 years
No benefit shown

Moderate. Placebo-controlled; no overall reduction (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.13).

Endpoint
Any adenoma and advanced adenoma, pooled
Population
2,632 adults with prior adenoma across three randomized trials at 0.5 or 1 mg/day
No benefit shown

High. Combined analysis; RR 0.98 for all adenomas, 1.06 for advanced lesions.

Evidence by specific use

First-stroke prevention in hypertensive adults without prior stroke or MI, in populations without grain folate fortification (0.8 mg/day with enalapril)
Grade B
Huo et al., CSPPT (JAMA, 2015; PMID 25771069): 20,702 Chinese adults with hypertension and no history of stroke or myocardial infarction, randomized double-blind to a single pill of enalapril 10 mg with folic acid 0.8 mg or enalapril 10 mg alone for a median 4.5 years; first stroke 2.7 percent against 3.4 percent (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.93). Both arms received enalapril, so the trial isolates folic acid, but only on a background of ACE inhibitor therapy and at 0.8 mg/day, a different dose from the 1 mg/day the headline grades. Participants were not selected for folate deficiency. Zhang et al. (Clin Nutr, 2024; PMID 38824900): meta-analysis of 21 randomized trials, 115,559 participants, stroke risk 10 percent lower overall; efficacy did not vary by baseline folate, and was concentrated in areas without grain fortification (RR 0.83) and in people without prior stroke or MI (RR 0.77); no effect in fortified areas (RR 1.04). Yang et al. (Front Nutr, 2024; PMID 39155933): meta-analysis of 12 primary-prevention trials, 75,042 participants, null overall (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.05) and positive only without grain fortification (RR 0.78). Grade B rather than A: a hard endpoint, but the benefit is confined to unfortified populations, was tested on a background of ACE inhibitor therapy, and the primary-prevention pool is null overall. In fortified populations such as the US the pooled trials show no benefit. This does not change the base Grade D, which reflects folic acid's failure to prevent colorectal adenoma recurrence. Funding: PubMed's record of the CSPPT report lists no funder and no conflict statement; the full JAMA report was not read in this pass, and nonfinancial support from the maker of the combination pill reported in secondary sources is not asserted here.
PMID 25771069 PMID 38824900 PMID 39155933
PMID 25771069 PMID 38824900 PMID 39155933
Major cardiovascular events in people with vascular disease (folic acid with vitamins B6 and B12)
Grade D
HOPE-2 (Lonn et al., N Engl J Med, 2006; PMID 16531613): 5,522 adults aged 55 and over with vascular disease or diabetes, folic acid 2.5 mg with B6 and B12 daily for 5 years; homocysteine fell, primary events 18.8 against 19.8 percent (relative risk 0.95, 0.84 to 1.07); stroke was lower (0.75) and hospitalization for unstable angina higher (1.24). NORVIT (Bønaa et al., N Engl J Med, 2006; PMID 16531614): 3,749 patients within a week of a heart attack; folic acid with B12 had no effect (risk ratio 1.08, 0.93 to 1.25), and the three-vitamin arm trended toward harm (1.22, 1.00 to 1.50). Martí-Carvajal et al. (Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017; PMID 28816346), 15 trials and 71,422 participants: no effect on myocardial infarction (risk ratio 1.02) or death from any cause (1.01), with a small stroke reduction (0.90). Lowering homocysteine did not lower heart attacks or deaths: tested, no benefit. Stroke prevention is graded on its own row.
PMID 16531613 PMID 16531614 PMID 28816346
PMID 16531613 PMID 16531614 PMID 28816346

Why Grade D Route 2 and not Grade C

Grade D Route 2 applies when a compound has been tested in humans and benefit was not shown. Folic Acid (supplemental, 1 mg/day) has been tested in 3 human trials on endpoints relevant to the claim being evaluated, and the primary endpoint was not met.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial pre-specifying a meaningful clinical or functional endpoint and demonstrating statistically significant benefit would move this to Grade C or higher, depending on effect size, population size, and whether it is independently replicated.

What this grade covers and what it does not

Grade D on Route 2: tested, no benefit demonstrated. Cole 2007 (PMID 17551129) randomized 1,021 adults with a prior colorectal adenoma to 1 mg/day folic acid, with colonoscopic surveillance at three and six years. Adenoma recurrence was not reduced, and the authors flagged a possible increase in advanced and multiple neoplasia that they described as requiring further study. Wu 2009 (PMID 19864409) and ukCAP (PMID 18022173) replicated the null, and the pooled analysis of all three trials (PMID 21170989) gives RR 0.98. The badge reads no benefit rather than harm because the neoplasia signal was raised by the investigators as a question and was not established as a finding; the long-term follow-up (PMID 31401653) found more sessile serrated lesions with extended use, a signal that did not persist after treatment stopped, and a 13-trial meta-analysis (PMID 23352552) found no overall cancer increase. WHAT THIS GRADE DOES NOT COVER: this letter grades 1 mg/day supplemental folic acid for preventing colorectal adenoma recurrence. It does not grade folate in pregnancy, where randomized evidence supports neural tube defect prevention and the question is not in dispute. It does not grade repletion of a documented deficiency, and it does not grade dietary folate. A D on one indication says nothing about the others.

What would move this grade

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial pre-specifying a clinical aging endpoint and demonstrating statistically significant benefit on that primary endpoint would be sufficient to move this to Grade C or higher, depending on effect size and population.

How to track whether this is working No validated human outcome to track for this indication.