In plain terms: Bromelain has been tested in human trials aimed at the relevant outcome and did not show benefit at the doses and durations studied. The animal research may be encouraging, but it has not yet translated to humans in these trials.
Bromelain
The evidence as the record states it
Brien et al. (QJM, 2006; PMID 17121765): randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 47 adults with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis, bromelain alone 800 mg/day for 12 weeks; no difference from placebo on WOMAC or any subscale. Ley et al. (Chin J Integr Med, 2016; PMID 27412590): randomized placebo-controlled trial, bromelain alone 1,050 mg/day for 12 weeks in adults with diabetes; no effect on fibrinogen or CRP. Henrotin et al. (RMD Open, 2025; PMID 40803821): randomized trial of a three-ingredient product (bromelain with trypsin and rutoside), fully sponsored by the company that supplied the product; it grades the combination, not bromelain.
Trials showing no benefit
Low to moderate. Small single placebo-controlled trial; null.
Low. Small exploratory placebo-controlled trial; null.
Why Grade D Route 2 and not Grade C
Grade D Route 2 applies when a compound has been tested in humans and benefit was not shown. Bromelain has been tested in 2 human trials on endpoints relevant to the claim being evaluated, and the primary endpoint was not met.
A randomized, placebo-controlled trial pre-specifying a meaningful clinical or functional endpoint and demonstrating statistically significant benefit would move this to Grade C or higher, depending on effect size, population size, and whether it is independently replicated.
What this grade covers and what it does not
What would move this grade
A randomized, placebo-controlled trial pre-specifying a clinical aging endpoint and demonstrating statistically significant benefit on that primary endpoint would be sufficient to move this to Grade C or higher, depending on effect size and population.