In plain terms: Tadalafil (daily, for longevity) has not yet been tested in a human trial designed to measure the outcome relevant here. The available human research does not yet answer the question.
Tadalafil (daily, for longevity)
The evidence as the record states it
Kloner et al. (Clin Cardiol, 2024; PMID 38377018): retrospective cohort in a US commercial insurance claims database; 8,156 men with erectile dysfunction and at least one tadalafil claim against 21,012 with no claim for any PDE-5 inhibitor, matched for cardiovascular risk factors. Over about three years, adjusted major cardiovascular events were 19 percent lower (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.94) and death from any cause 44 percent lower (hazard ratio 0.56, 0.43 to 0.74). Funded through a grant from Sanofi; the first author is a paid Sanofi consultant. Soulaidopoulos et al. (Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother, 2024; PMID 38777751): meta-analysis of 16 cohort studies, 1,257,759 people, 99.4 percent men; PDE-5 inhibitor use went with fewer major cardiovascular events (risk ratio 0.78) and lower all-cause mortality (0.70); the authors call for randomized trials, which have not been run. Egerdie et al. (J Sex Med, 2012; PMID 21981682): randomized phase 3 trial, tadalafil 2.5 mg or 5 mg once daily or placebo for 12 weeks in 606 men aged 45 and over with erectile dysfunction and prostate symptoms; both doses improved erections, only 5 mg improved prostate symptoms. Trolle Lagerros et al. (J Am Coll Cardiol, 2024; PMID 38233015): Swedish registers, 55,777 men with coronary artery disease on nitrates; the 5,710 who also filled PDE-5 inhibitor prescriptions had higher mortality (hazard ratio 1.39) and more heart attacks (1.72). Observational. Grade D on Route 1: the longevity claim has no randomized trial behind it.
Why Grade D Route 1 and not Grade C
Grade D Route 1 applies when no qualifying human randomized trial has tested this compound or intervention against the relevant endpoint. Absence confirmed: (PubMed, 2026-11)
The first qualifying human RCT with a meaningful endpoint would move this to Grade C or higher, depending on what it shows.
What this grade covers and what it does not
What would move this grade
The first qualifying randomized controlled trial in humans, testing this intervention against a meaningful aging-relevant endpoint, would initiate grading. Depending on the result, it could land at any grade from A to D.
How this was studied
No trial has given tadalafil to healthy men for aging. The observational studies recorded men with erectile dysfunction filling ordinary tadalafil prescriptions, at doses chosen for erections, and compared them with men who filled none (Kloner 2024; PMID 38377018). Daily tadalafil at 2.5 mg or 5 mg was tested for 12 weeks in men aged 45 and over with erectile dysfunction and prostate symptoms (Egerdie 2012; PMID 21981682), not for heart events, death or aging.